Show simple item record

dc.creatorPaunović, Svetlana A.
dc.creatorJevremović, Darko
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T12:17:43Z
dc.date.available2023-04-11T12:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0567-7572
dc.identifier.urihttps://refri.institut-cacak.org/handle/123456789/133
dc.description.abstractTwenty selected pome fruit cultivars, i.e., 11 apple, 6 pear and 3 quince cultivars, were propagated and tested for the presence of economically important viruses, ACLSV, ASPV, ASGV and ApMV, through different methods. Reliability of virus detection was tested by biological indexing under field conditions over 20022005 comparatively with laboratory DAS-ELISA tests as well as by RT-PCR method for ASPV and ASGV. The stated viruses, either individually or in mixed infection, were detected in 7 of the tested cultivars, except for ApMV which was not detected in any of the cultivars both by biological and laboratory testing. In detection of ACLSV the results obtained did not depend on the used technique, biological indexing or DAS-ELISA, which justifies usage of DAS-ELISA for routine testing. Bearing in mind time and space required for biological indexing, obtained results have also suggested that both ASPV and ASGV may be positively and more rapidly detected by RTPCR. Both of these viruses were detected by DAS-ELISA tests in flower petals of all infected apple cultivars. This kind of sample is not always available, particularly not during certification process, which makes routine usage of DAS-ELISA unreliable in detection of these viruses. In contrast to apples, although the results are preliminary, it was not possible to detect ASPV neither in young leaves nor in flower petals of pear isolates.en
dc.publisherInternational Society for Horticultural Science, Leuven 1
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceProceedings of the Twentieth International Symposium on Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of Temperate Fruit Crops - Fruit Tree Diseases
dc.subjectvirusesen
dc.subjectRT-PCRen
dc.subjectpome fruitsen
dc.subjectELISAen
dc.subjectdetectionen
dc.subjectbiological indexingen
dc.titleComparative results of detection of pome fruit viruses by different methodsen
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage153
dc.citation.issue781
dc.citation.other(781): 147-153
dc.citation.spage147
dc.identifier.doi10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.781.22
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1364
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-44349184878
dc.identifier.wos000256218900022
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record